Download Da 2166 9 1 Template Customize Document Here

Download Da 2166 9 1 Template

The DA 2166 9 1 form is an essential document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This form captures critical information about an NCO's performance, professional attributes, and potential for future assignments. Properly filling out this form is crucial for accurate assessments and career progression; get started by clicking the button below.

Customize Document Here
Table of Contents

The DA 2166-9-1 form serves as a crucial tool for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation report encapsulates various aspects of an NCO's service, offering a structured way to assess their contributions, skills, and potential for advancement. It includes essential administrative data such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number, rank, and the specific period being evaluated. The form also requires input from multiple rating officials, including the rater and senior rater, ensuring a comprehensive review of the NCO's performance. Each section is meticulously designed to capture key performance indicators, such as adherence to Army values, leadership abilities, and overall professionalism. Moreover, the form highlights the importance of counseling dates and the NCO's understanding of the evaluation process, ensuring transparency and accountability. By utilizing this form, the Army can maintain high standards of leadership and effectiveness within its ranks, ultimately fostering a culture of excellence and continuous improvement.

Document Specs

Fact Name Detail
Form Purpose The DA 2166-9-1 is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3.
Privacy Act The form includes a Privacy Act Statement as outlined in AR 623-3.
Submission Details Part I of the form requires detailed administrative data, including the NCO's name, SSN, rank, and unit information.
Authentication Process In Part II, the rater and senior rater must sign and date the form to authenticate the evaluation.
Performance Evaluation Part IV evaluates various competencies such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement.

Key takeaways

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, which is the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report for Sergeants, is a crucial process for evaluating performance and potential. Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind:

  • Understand the Purpose: This form is designed to assess the performance and potential of NCOs, providing a structured way to document achievements and areas for improvement.
  • Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information, including name, SSN, rank, and unit, is accurately filled out in Part I.
  • Rater and Senior Rater Information: The names and signatures of the rater and senior rater are essential. Make sure these are completed to validate the evaluation.
  • Performance Evaluation: Part IV focuses on various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area should be assessed thoroughly.
  • Comments are Crucial: Providing specific comments for each evaluation area enhances the clarity and usefulness of the report. Avoid vague statements.
  • Counseling Dates: Record the dates of counseling sessions in Part II. This documentation is vital for tracking the NCO’s development.
  • Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement but verifies that they have seen the report and understand its content.
  • Potential Assessment: The senior rater must evaluate the NCO’s potential compared to peers, selecting from categories such as "Most Qualified" or "Not Qualified."
  • Enclosures: If there are additional documents that support the evaluation, ensure they are listed in the appropriate section.
  • Review the Appeals Process: Familiarize yourself with the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3 in case there are disagreements about the evaluation.

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form accurately and thoughtfully is essential for fair evaluations and career progression within the Army. Each section plays a significant role in providing a comprehensive view of the NCO's performance and potential.

Documents used along the form

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it often accompanies other forms and documents that provide additional context or fulfill related requirements. Understanding these documents can help ensure a comprehensive evaluation process.

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form serves as the evaluation report for NCOs in the ranks of Staff Sergeant (SSG) through Sergeant Major (SGM). It builds upon the information provided in the DA Form 2166-9-1 and is used for higher-level evaluations, capturing a broader scope of the NCO's performance and potential.
  • DA Form 4856: The Developmental Counseling Form is essential for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It helps to identify areas for improvement and sets goals, ensuring that the soldier receives constructive feedback throughout their career.
  • DA Form 67-10-1: This form is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for company grade officers. While it evaluates officers, it can be relevant in cases where NCOs are being assessed in relation to their leadership and interaction with officers, providing a complete picture of the command environment.
  • Emotional Support Animal Letter: This document is essential for individuals seeking support from their emotional support animals, providing verification of their need. For more information, visit fillable-forms.com/.
  • AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation of soldiers. It provides the framework within which the DA Form 2166-9-1 and other evaluation forms operate, ensuring that all evaluations are consistent and fair.

By familiarizing yourself with these related forms and documents, you can enhance the evaluation process for NCOs. Each document plays a unique role in creating a well-rounded assessment, ultimately contributing to the professional development of soldiers in the Army.

How to Write Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important step in the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Once filled out, this form will be used to assess the performance and potential of the rated NCO. Follow the steps below to ensure accurate completion of the form.

  1. Part I - Administrative Data:
    • Enter the rated NCO's full name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number.
    • Fill in the rank of the rated NCO.
    • Indicate the date of rank.
    • Complete the PMOSC (Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code).
    • List the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
    • Enter the status code.
    • Provide the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
    • Specify the reason for submission.
    • Indicate the period covered by the evaluation (From/Thru).
    • Fill in the number of rated months.
    • Complete the non-rated codes.
    • List the number of enclosures.
    • Enter the rated NCO's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
  2. Part II - Authentication:
    • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
    • The rater must sign and date the form (YYYYMMDD).
    • Fill in the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
    • Enter the rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
    • Repeat the above steps for the senior rater, including name, SSN, signature, date, rank, and email address.
    • If applicable, fill in the supplementary reviewer's information, including name, rank, and comments.
    • The supplementary reviewer must sign and date the form.
  3. Part III - Duty Description:
    • Provide the principal duty title.
    • Fill in the duty MOSC.
    • Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and financial responsibilities.
    • List areas of special emphasis.
    • Specify any appointed duties.
  4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
    • Indicate APFT pass/fail/profile status and date.
    • Enter height and weight, confirming if within standards.
    • Provide comments if APFT failed or if weight standards were not met.
    • Evaluate character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, providing comments for each.
    • Rate the overall performance of the rated NCO.
  5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
    • Select a box representing the rated NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade.
    • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

After completing the form, ensure that all information is accurate and legible. Review the completed form for any errors before submission, as this will help facilitate a smooth evaluation process.

Misconceptions

Understanding the DA 2166-9-1 form is crucial for NCO evaluations, but several misconceptions can lead to confusion. Here are nine common misunderstandings:

  1. The form is only for senior NCOs. The DA 2166-9-1 form is specifically designed for evaluating Sergeants (SGT) and is applicable to NCOs at this rank.
  2. All sections of the form must be filled out by the rated NCO. While the rated NCO provides certain information, many sections are completed by the rater and senior rater.
  3. Signatures indicate agreement with the evaluation. The rated NCO's signature confirms the accuracy of administrative data, not agreement with the assessment.
  4. The form is not confidential. The DA 2166-9-1 contains sensitive information, and proper handling is necessary to protect the rated NCO's privacy.
  5. Only negative comments can lead to an appeal. Appeals can be made for any perceived inaccuracies, whether positive or negative.
  6. The form does not require a performance evaluation. A detailed performance evaluation is a critical component, assessing various attributes and competencies.
  7. Raters can evaluate without prior knowledge of the NCO. Raters must have sufficient familiarity with the rated NCO's performance to provide an accurate assessment.
  8. All evaluations are the same. Each evaluation is unique, reflecting the specific performance and potential of the individual NCO being assessed.
  9. Filling out the form is a one-time task. The evaluation process is ongoing, requiring regular counseling and updates throughout the rating period.

Clarifying these misconceptions can help ensure that the evaluation process is fair and effective for all parties involved.

Other PDF Forms

Similar forms

The DA Form 2166-9-1, which serves as an NCO Evaluation Report for sergeants, shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9, the NCO Evaluation Report for higher ranks. Both forms evaluate the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers within the Army. They include sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and recommendations for future assignments. The primary difference lies in the rank of the individual being evaluated, with the DA Form 2166-9 focusing on staff sergeants and above, while the 2166-9-1 is specifically for sergeants.

Another document comparable to the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 1059, which is used for academic evaluations. This form assesses the performance of soldiers who have completed formal training courses. Like the NCO Evaluation Report, it includes sections for administrative data and performance ratings. Both documents aim to provide a comprehensive overview of a soldier’s capabilities and contributions, but the DA Form 1059 specifically addresses educational achievements rather than day-to-day duties.

The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, is also similar in its purpose of documenting a soldier’s performance. This form is used for counseling sessions, which can include evaluations of performance, conduct, and areas for improvement. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 is a formal evaluation conducted annually or biannually, the DA Form 4856 is typically used for ongoing discussions about a soldier’s development and progress, making it a more frequent tool for performance management.

In addition to the various forms discussed, a Lease Agreement is another important document that protects the rights and obligations of both parties involved. For those seeking a structured approach to drafting such agreements, you can find resources through Legal PDF Documents, ensuring that you have a comprehensive template to work from that aligns with legal standards.

The DA Form 7000, or the Army Financial Readiness Program Counseling Form, bears some resemblance to the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that it addresses soldier welfare and performance. This form focuses on financial readiness and the soldier's ability to manage personal finances. It includes sections for assessment and recommendations, similar to the performance evaluation sections found in the NCO Evaluation Report. Both forms aim to ensure that soldiers are prepared to meet their responsibilities, whether in their professional duties or personal financial management.

The DA Form 67-10-1, which is used for officer evaluations, is another document that aligns with the DA Form 2166-9-1. It evaluates the performance of commissioned officers and includes similar components such as performance ratings and comments from superiors. Both forms serve to provide a structured assessment of an individual's contributions to the Army, although they cater to different ranks and roles within the military hierarchy.

Additionally, the DA Form 1103, which is the Army's Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report for the Reserve Components, is comparable. This form is designed for reserve component NCOs and shares many structural similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. Both documents assess the performance and potential of NCOs, but the DA Form 1103 specifically applies to those serving in the Army Reserve or National Guard, reflecting the unique aspects of their service.

Lastly, the DA Form 638, which is used for award recommendations, can be seen as similar in its evaluative nature. This form documents the achievements of soldiers and makes recommendations for awards based on performance. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on ongoing performance evaluations, the DA Form 638 is used to recognize specific accomplishments. Both forms require input from superiors and aim to highlight the contributions of soldiers to their units and the Army as a whole.